Greenpeace Ranks Tech Companies

December 08, 2006 | by Geoff Duncan

Greenpeace has updated its ranking of tech companies' eco-friendly manufacturing and recycling programs. Top of the heap? Nokia. Bottom of the barrel? Apple.

Environmental watchdog and activism group Greenpeace has updated its report card on the manufacturing and recycling practices of computer and mobile manufacturers. Greenpeace ranks companies' policies and processes on two interrelated criteria: action taken to remove hazardous chemicals and materials from their products, and their efforts to recycle and take back products once they become obsolete.

At the top of Greenpeace's list—but still not firmly in the organization's "green" criteria—is Finlands's Nokia, which ranked well across all areas, but which Greenpeace feels still needs to set clear timelines for phasing out PVC (PolyVinyl Chloride) from its processes. Motorola jumped from next-to-last to fourth place overall, largely on the basis of public commitments to convert to eco-friendly processes. Greenpeace also reports that computer makers Acer and Lenovo are promised to remove hazardous materials from their products.

The bottom of the list is Apple Computer, which Greenpeace's toxic campaigner Iza Kruszewska characterized as having made "absolutely no improvements to its policies or practices since the ranking was first released three months ago, although most of its competitors have improved environmental policies." The characterization is unusual since Apple is usually regarded as one of the greener of electronics manufacturers, regularly noting how much electronic waste it has recycled, committing to recycling e-waste domestically rather than shipping it overseas, and shaming other manufacturers into introducing retail take-back and recycling programs. But according to Greenpeace, the famously secretive company has made no improvements to its policies or practices since Greenpeace issued its first report card in August, has never disclosed hazardous substances included in its products, and has offered no timelines or commitments to removing PVCs or brominated flame retardants from its products.

Post Your Comment...Comments

Orlowski Zygmunt on Jan 24th, 2007 at 2:19 PM:

Clean the air? It is possible. Clean water? It is possible too.
Clean energy? It is possible as well.
My idea is very difficult for understanding. It is not difficult for engineer - mechanic, who knows very good the Pascal's law and even-arm lever.
Please open GOOgle and find metozor and next :
index of metozor.
Overthere is all about idea of main .
example : http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/for_greenpeace.html or
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/energy_for_everybody.h...
http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/prolog_for_metoz.html
Email this article to a friends.

Orlowski Zygmunt on Jan 31st, 2007 at 1:10 PM:

The conception of an energy is discreate one to the same as a imbecility. No one has seen the energy and no one has seen the imbecility. We are able to observe results of the energy and imbecility. At present we have got to few energy because we have got to much imbecility.
Thank you for your time and interest.

Comment on this article




Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.

When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.

HTML is not allowed.




Join our newsletter to keep up to date on the latest Digital Trends content like Videos, Reviews, News and more delivered directly to your email!


Plus, get early access to contests and specials from our partners. Join today!





Loading...