Lawsuit May Delay SED TVs
January 02, 2007 | by Geoff Duncan
Austin-based Nano-Proprietary has filed suit against Canon, arguing its technology can't be used in SED, Inc., a joint venture with Toshiba.
The development of flat-panel televisions based on SED (surface-conduction electron-emitter display) technology may be delayed by a lawsuit filed against Canon by U.S. technology developer Nano-Proprietary Inc. of Austin, Texas.
Back in 2003, Canon and Toshiba joined forces to create a joint venture company, SED Inc, split almost 50-50 between the two companies: Canon owns 50 percent plus one share, and Toshiba owns everything else. SED Inc. was charged with developing flat-panel television displays based in SED technology; in a nutshell, SEC displays are like CRT televisions, but pack an electron emitter into every pixel so they use less power (and are far thinner) than their CRT predecessors. In October 2006, Canon and Toshiba announced they planned to start mass production of SED televisions in early 2008; however, those plans may have to be put on hold in the face of Nano-Proprietary's suit.
Nano-Proprietary licensed technology used in SED displays to Canon; however, Nano-Proprietary is suing Canon claiming that SED Inc., is not a Canon subsidiary because, although Canon (barely) holds a majority stake, Toshiba still holds decision-making power over the company. Therefore, Canon's license of Nano-Proprietary technology can't be transferred to SED, Inc.: if they want to make SED TVs at the joint venture, they'll need to execute a new patent license. And Nano-Proprietary's case has been gathering some steam: in November, a judge refused to recognize SED, Inc., as a Canon subsidiary (PDF), allowing the case to move forward.
Japanese media outlets have offered contradictory reports on Canon's plans to resolve the situation; Nihon Keizai Shimbun reports Canon will increase its stake in SED, Inc., so that it can be counted as a legal subsidiary, while Asahi Shimbun reported Canon and Toshiba plan to shut down the joint venture later in January.
Post Your Comment...Comments
TechFreak on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 8:35 PM:
Reminds me of LCoS and the struggle they have had. But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into. Of course my gut is that Nano-Proprietary is just gold-digging.
Tantrum on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 8:36 PM:
Who cares about SED? Laser and OLED displays are where it's att anyways...
DKDiveDude on Jan 4th, 2007 at 11:37 AM:
"...But if Canon is ripping off technology, they should defintely be looked into..."
Can you not read? Try again:
"Nano-Proprietary licensed technology used in SED displays to Canon"
Canon formed a new company with Toshiba as they have experience with producing TV's
Lyvewyre on Feb 4th, 2007 at 12:10 PM:
I think SED will be a winner. Even though OLED is great, who knows how long it will take to come to market.
FED TV Reviews on May 12th, 2007 at 12:13 PM:
The latest news has Canon renegotiating with Nano to bring out a limited number of sets by the end of 2007.
erik on Dec 16th, 2007 at 5:36 AM:
Toshiba delay there OLED Tvs to 2011. Laser-TV can me realized 2008, FED-TV also!
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

James on Jan 3rd, 2007 at 8:28 PM:
Personally I did not think that SED TV's were ever going to make it in the first place. Canon simply will not be able to sell TV's on their name alone, and my guess is that Toshiba is dumping so much money into HD DVD that they would not be able to push SED anyways.
But its a shame about the lawsuit, its probably the last thing they need.