Apple Draws Ire Pushing Safari to Windows
March 24, 2008 | by Geoff Duncan
Windows users with iTunes or QuickTime installed may have noticed Apple's Software Update utility offering the Safari 3.1 Web browser...set to download by default.
Apple has been shipping its own Web browser Safari with Mac OS X for several years now, and announced a version Safari for Windows a year ago. Safari represents a healthy share of the Macintosh browser market, but in terms of the overall Internet Safari is still in the single digits in terms of browser share. So no one was truly surprised that Apple would attempt to leverage the near ubiquity of its QuickTime and iTunes software as a way to introduce Windows users to other Apple applications: what surprises people is that Apple is using the updating capability to push new applications to those users by default.
Windows users who have QuickTime and/or iTunes installed are no doubt familiar with Apple's Software Update utility, which periodically informs users when updates and patched versions of the software are available. Online update utilities are important components for operating systems and network-accessible software, giving vendors a simple way for users to update security patches and bug fixes. However, with the recently released Safari 3.1, the browser has turned up as an new component in Apple's Software Update utility, and it is set to download by default. The result is that if users go along with Apple's recommended software update, they get an entirely new application—unrelated to Apple software they already have installed—as part of the update.
The Safari 3.1 install is also enabled by default on Mac OS X systems; however, Safari ships as a default application with Mac OS X. Similarly, Windows users who already have Safari installed will see version 3.1 show up as an automatically-enabled update.
"What Apple is doing now with their Apple Software Update on Windows is wrong," wrote Mozilla head John Lilly in his blog. "It's wrong because it undermines the trust that we're all trying to build with users. Because it means that an update isn't just an update, but is maybe something more. Because it ultimately undermines the safety of users on the Web by eroding that relationship."
Many industry watchers have opined that it makes sense for Apple to promote Safari 3.1 to Windows Users via Software Update, but criticize the company for making the download enabled by default, arguing a better option would have been to have the download disabled by default, or somehow distinguished as a new application rather than an update to existing software. (Some have noted Software Update may lack this sort of functionality.)
Others argue Apple's move is about browser share and money, and Mozilla's grousing about the move has more to do with revenue earned via Google's prominent placement as the default search engine for Mozilla than Apple's distribution tactics. Firefox earns the vast majority of its revenue from Google searches conducted via Firefox's search box: Safari also has Google set as its default search engine, and a growing number of Windows users converting to Safari could mean declining revenues for Firefox, if those users come at Firefox's expense rather than Internet Explorer's. After all, Mozilla doesn't have cash cows like well-established iPod and Macintosh businesses to rely on if its search revenue starts to dry up.
Post Your Comment...Comments
RX8 on Mar 24th, 2008 at 4:21 PM:
This is news because its a web browser, they have been pushing quicktime from the start.
And this is total BS in my opinion. Apple is using spyware tactics here.
Jason Howard on Mar 24th, 2008 at 4:27 PM:
I believe iTunes needs Quicktime for video playback and and I think conversion of audio files (hence ripping a cd.)
Romel Alibudbud on Mar 24th, 2008 at 4:50 PM:
As a user, I want to be informed. So having the Safari download offered to me during an Apple software update process is a positive service rather than something nefarious. As long as I have the option to accept or decline, then its okay with me.
RX8 on Mar 24th, 2008 at 11:32 PM:
Romel, I think by default its set to download and you wouldn't know it. It's through the auto update feature.
Ian Kemmish on Mar 25th, 2008 at 6:50 AM:
"It's wrong because it undermines the trust that we're all trying to build with users."
And pray tell, how large is the type in the alert box that informs Firefox users that their searches are being directed through Google in return for revenue? Call me old fashioned, but something like that seems far more likely to undermine trust than a straightforward plug for one's own products.
If you want me to trust you, Mr LIlly, you'll first have to stop playing games like that.
Peter robbed paul on Mar 25th, 2008 at 9:02 AM:
But Ian, two wrongs do not make a right.
Apple is still being sneaky here....
Webster Phreaky on Mar 28th, 2008 at 2:50 PM:
IMAGINE IF THIS WERE MICROSOFT pulling this essentially Spyware Tactic?? Can you juts guess the uproar that the Apple Whore Media would be screaming at the top of their Liberal little hearts.
AppleTards and Apple are Hypocrites. This is ANOTHER Pathetic activity by Stevie Gods and his band of A-Holes in Stupertino. Just like Obama has turned this election into a racewar, Apple's activities like this and those lying TV and Magazine Ads will turn PC users (95% market) into more aggressive Apple haters. Just when will MS start fighting back?
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.
RSS Feed
fuzz on Mar 24th, 2008 at 4:03 PM:
This isn't exactly new; they've been pushing QuickTime out by default with iTunes all along, even though one doesn't need QT to run iTunes (nor does it provide any benefit I'm aware of).