Comcast Wants to Craft P2P Bill of Rights
April 16, 2008 | by Geoff Duncan
Cable operator Comcast - under fire for interfering with P2P traffic on its network - says it wants to develop a "Bill of Rights and Responsibilities" for file-sharing.
Giant U.S. cable operator Comcast is currently being investigated by the FCC for interfering with peer-to-peering traffic from its subscribers, but recently said it will stop blocking P2P traffic in favor of other traffic-management techniques. Now, the company is partnering with Pando Networks in an effort to develop a "P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities," a document which would try to define both consumer options and network operators' best practices for managing P2P applications on their networks, as serve as a standard for the industry. "Working together, Comcast and Pando can help lead the discussion about what consumers should expect in terms of a 'P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities' for P2P users and ISPs," said Comcast CTO Tony Werner, in a statement. "By having this framework in place, we will help P2P companies, ISPs, and content owners find common ground to support consumers who want to use P2P applications to deliver legal content." Peer-to-peer file sharing applications like BitTorrent are often used to distribute and download illegal copies of music, movies, and other digital content, but increasingly the technology is being leveraged to distribute legitimate digital content, including Hollywood movies. Comcast and Pando say they want to get the major players to sit down this spring, and have the so-called Bill of Rights ironed out later in 2008. The move is striking Comcast's critics as little more than a PR move designed to deflect attention from the company's current and past behavior. "Comcast has thumbed its nose at the existing consumer bill of rights—the FCC's Internet policy statement guaranteeing access to all online content and services," wrote Free Press' general counsel Marvin Ammori, who authored the FCC complaint against Comcast, in a statement. "Now facing unprecedented public, government, and media scrutiny, Comcast is desperately trying to change the subject with a few over-hyped side conversations." Indeed, Comcast's "P2P Bill of Rights" is likely an effort to establish to the FCC that the broadband industry is capable of regulating itself, and doesn't need additional federal rules and oversight from the FCC. Communications companies have generally regarded any sort of federal oversight as burdensome and an inhibition on their ability to develop new services and revenue models. Comcast also announced it will be testing Pando's Network Aware P2P technology to identify ways to better manage traffic; previously, Comcast announced a partnership with BitTorrent to help manage P2P traffic on its network. Pando has previously partnered with Verizon to improve P2P performance; unlike traditional P2P software applications, Pando's solution focuses on distributing large fies between small groups, and enabling downloads of large data blocks from major content providers.
Post Your Comment...Comments
Jamespn1333 on Apr 17th, 2008 at 2:30 AM:
Comcast and other cable companies really suck. It's not as if P2P is anything new or wasn't around when they started providing Internet service to the public. This simple fact is that they are CHEAP *******S and only want to stall the cost of expanding it's network to handle the traffic it is seeking to make more money at the expense of people who are already customers of theirs.
I suggest that Comcast and other ISP providers get out of the business if they can't spend 50% of the income they receive for Internet service so that existing customers can get what they've already paid for and come to expect.
If you work for Comcast or any of the other cable companies and my post bothers or upsets you, then I suggest you BYTE ME !!!
Bulk Vending Guy on Apr 17th, 2008 at 11:56 AM:
I doubt that Comcast is doing this just to reduce traffic on their network. Remember that Comcast is owned by, and has close relationships, with media publishing companies. This move is two part. Primarily they are trying to protect themselves from litigation and why should they enable people to pirate media to which they hold the IP rights?
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

Jamespn1333 on Apr 17th, 2008 at 2:29 AM:
Comcast and other cable companies really suck. It's not as if P2P is anything new or wasn't around when they started providing Internet service to the public. This simple fact is that they are CHEAP *******S and only want to stall the cost of expanding it's network to handle the traffic it is seeking to make more money at the expense of people who are already customers of theirs.
I suggest that Comcast and other ISP providers get out of the business if they can't spend 50% of the income they receive for Internet service so that existing customers can get what they've already paid for and come to expect.
If you work for Comcast or any of the other cable companies and my post bothers or upsets you, then I suggest you BYTE ME !!!