Windows Vista: Game On
August 31st, 2006 | by Scott Steinberg
Post Your Comment...Comments
Ian Bell on Aug 31st, 2006 at 9:21 AM:
Good reasons. I am still concerned that I will have to upgrade all of my hardware to take real advantage of Vista though, and that can get costly.
Are there any new games included with the OS rather than just revamped Minesweeper etc?
Microsoft needs to incorporate their Live Arcade into the OS, then I will be happy! :)
Scott Steinberg on Aug 31st, 2006 at 9:28 AM:
Games Explorer should make your life a lot easier in terms of layout, one-touch access. And re: hardware specs, check the official Vista site - basics aren't as bad as you'd think, but yeah. Expect to shell out for a nice video card, some extra RAM.
As for Live Arcade, just go to Download.com or visit the casual games portals (Big Fish, iWin, etc.). It'd be nice to have a single, easily interpreted interface like that on the PC, but hey - why wait?
Owyn on Sep 1st, 2006 at 12:34 PM:
Scott I think you are over Exagerating the usefulness of some of these new Features, sure they are all nice and myself being a new father know that being able to tell your children what they can't play is the best thing that parents can get... but, the fact that you tell them this doesn't mean that they aren't just going to go to a friends house and play it just because you have it blocked... parental controls are over rated and should be able to be done with software anyway so this "advancement in the OS" isn't the biggest nor is it very impressive, that's like saying that Tabbed browsing is Internet Explores New Feature.
Further, If it weren't for the fact that MS is deciding to try and FORCE the gaming community over to Vista Via Direct X 10 I think is Draconian not a parental control... Personally my machine with it's fancy pants PCI-X X1900 and 2GB of ram run great and all I need now is a PhysX processor and all well be right with the world. Yeah sure I COULD shell out 175-200$ for the Home Version of Vista but then I wouldn't have that to spend on my new hardware.
To continue, and sure I haven't seen it, the one click to get to your favorite gaming discussion forums, I can do that now with bookmarks, so once again not an advancement just a simple move of a function to the Start Bar, I love my start bar don't get me wrong but that's all this is.
And now finally onto your Happy Games Explorer, unless this is some form of quick menu that I could mouse over or use like my Steam Client then I'm not interested, currently every game that I have has a shortcut under a simple mouse over menu in my startbar as it is, with my apps under another menu and Productivity Soft, Like my copy of Open Office and such under a third.
Yeah I know I am coming off as a Vista Hating pain in the rear, but really how much of an advancement are most of the things you covered besides the drool fest that DX10 Creates, and then Why can't that just be ported back to Windows XP, oh wait because MS wants to bleed you dry, well not you cause you already got a copy of it but they sure want to bleed the base consumer dry.
Ian Bell on Sep 1st, 2006 at 6:08 PM:
I would have to say that I am right there with Owyn. There is no reason that MS cannot bring DirextX 10 over to Windows XP. They are forcing consumer into purchasing their new OS simply by stating that you NEED this system to play any new games. The hardware is there for XP, why do we need a new OS right?
Bishop on Sep 6th, 2006 at 4:25 PM:
It's going to take 3 to 5 years before the compagny make game for directx 10. To much people
will not buy Vista.
James on Sep 29th, 2006 at 8:45 PM:
I have to concur with Owyn as well. DirectX 10 is not a reason to buy an OS (nor is new and improved Minesweeper). I'm sure I'll end up buying Vista, but I'm already afraid that they haven't done a good job with security -- my biggest concern -- given that they've released bug fixes for the OS before it is even OUT! And, the bug fix was for the same problem in XP and Vista, meaning they must share a lot of the same code. That doesn't speak to years and years of improvement to me.
Scott Steinberg on Oct 12th, 2006 at 3:10 PM:
Yep, I hear ya - a lot of these items are simple refinements/functional tweaks, and certainly MS could have incorporated them into its existing system. But hey, the die's cast at this point, and you have to keep in mind the average computer user's unfamiliarity with a lot of this stuff.
Anything that puts gaming front and center for them and makes it easier to learn the basics does us all a favor. Certainly, a hardcore gamer knows where to get new mods, hit the message boards, how to pimp a rig, et al. But it's the casual markets which are booming, and I think enhancements like these - plus the surrounding publicity they'll generate - will be a boon to us all. This just opens the door for more fence-sitters to see what can be done if you really get into the hobby.
Although agreed, shoehorning DX10 in as an exclusive is mighty sneaky. Let's be thankful they haven't threatened to shut down XP's web browsing capabilities by Dec 31, haha.
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

Barry on Aug 31st, 2006 at 9:19 AM:
haha Nex-gen minesweeper! That damn addicting game! Games explorer sounds interesting, I just wonder if it will really be useful or not.