CES vs. Macworld: Will Apple own 2008
December 31st, 2007 | by Rob Enderle
As you may recall, last year saw Apple bump heads hard with the rest of the technology industry at CES and MacWorld; Apple was so overmatched that rather than David and Goliath, it was more like Bambi vs. Godzilla. This only makes the fact that Bambi kicked Godzilla’s butt back then all the more impressive. This year though, the proverbial Godzilla in this scenario is coming armed to the teeth. However, Bambi has also been working out as well, and this makes for one heck of an impending battle royale between the two parties. Let’s discuss the upcoming confrontation this week. Apple’s Armament: As 2007 ends, we’re seeing Apple putting Think Secret – one of its leading fan sites – out of business which may have implications for news coverage surrounding the company in 2008 and clearly makes Apple appear far less friendly than it typically does. Nevertheless, expected to eventually launch this year, January 2008 may be too early for the iPhone Nano to make an appearance, although it is probably safe to anticipate some third-party developer announcements surrounding this offering in the near future. What Silicon Valley is really buzzing about are the rumored new Apple laptops which are supposed to sport solid state drives (likely Pro only at first), a much thinner appearance and updated industrial design which are more in line with the iPhone than the iPod classic, which defined the old MacBook offerings. LED backlit displays have already emerged, but Apple hasn’t yet done outdoor viewable displays and these are a likely enhancement as well. In short, Apple is expected to once again try to take the lead in laptop design where it lagged (unexpectedly, I might add) Dell and HP for much of 2007. There is also a lot of buzz around an ultra-small laptop from Apple, but the Intel technology isn’t where it needs to be yet and so I’d expect that product next year, just before the Christmas rush at earliest. In terms of desktop products, there is also lot of noise surrounding the Mac Nano as well, an even smaller version of the little desktop that I made my desktop product of the year in 2006. Folks may be confusing this with the Apple TV 2 which is also expected, given that the original Apple TV kind of flopped. It is well past time for a smaller update on the Mac Mini as well, let alone one that makes more use of metals or is available in black coloring. Given that this product is often used as a media server inside the home, I’d expect Apple to better embrace such applications in 2008 given the system’s popularity and expect future efforts surrounding it to push in this direction. It’s well past time for Mac Pro redesign too, but MacWorld seems early for that and I’m not seeing much buzz on that product right now. Anyhow, the iPhone Nano, which will likely come later in the year, is the only product that looks to be capable of being a CES-beater and most of us anticipate that product as arriving much later in the year. A refresh of the iPhone itself likely won’t be enough to steal CES’ thunder, and the audience for Mac PC products just isn’t big enough, but a combination of the two could turn some heads. CES: The Empire Strikes Back On the flip side, technology vendors are loaded like a ear this year and they will be putting up a fight. On the cellular phone front is likely where you’ll see the biggest battle emerge as RIM begins to position itself for the biggest fight of its life. Up until now, Apple has been consumer-focused and RIM more business-focused. (If you are sharp, you’ve surely noticed by now that there are a lot of folks that have a RIM Blackberry for work AND an Apple iPhone.) This, of course, is just silly – people only want one, all-purpose phone. With Apple aiming to go after that spot, RIM is expected to double-down and showcase its idea of what the perfect combination device will be. And while the company doesn’t have Apple’s touch-sensitive functionality or way with design, when it comes to keyboards its efforts are nearly unmatched. LG, Samsung, Sony/Ericsson, Motorola, HTC, and others will be ramping up their efforts strongly as well. The company to watch here is likely HTC as it has both Google and Microsoft as strong partners with different efforts. No one even comes close to a partnership like this and the manufacturer’s HTC Touch was the closest we saw last year to an iPhone clone with advantages (price and email integration). HTC has a solid line of phones, and at the right price (with Google free is good) it could eclipse Apple in sales, and with the right product, could even own the entire segment (especially since its business isn’t just tied to AT&T). The company is light on marketing though, so building the needed wave of branding will be problematic. On the PC front, design is in. Expect Dell and HP to be running hard to eclipse Apple’s expected new models with much more stylish offerings of their own. We’ve already seen the HP Blackbird desktop and now it is nearly time for a Blackbird laptop to emerge. Rumors are this thing is drop-dead beautiful and will be just as revolutionary as its big brother. In fact, we may see the beginnings of a Blackbird line and that alone could help eclipse what Apple is offering. But Dell isn’t sleeping either – its Dell XPS One already featured Apple-quality marketing and was targeted solidly at the aging iMac (which had only been re-skinned last go-around). Still, to really compete it needs to expand into an entire product line as well. On the Alienware side, it has been a while since we’ve seen new products and it’s time for that brand’s own refresh to boot. Expect something stunning here as well, though the real win for the entire category will be a product that’s both light and powerful. We’ll see who gets that equation right. Sony and Toshiba have also been on the design warpath for some time. While Sony has been under a cloud of missteps for much of 2007, it’s looking better all of the time and Toshiba’s R500 which was technologically more advanced than anything on the market is due for a tweak to fix its initial shortcomings. Both of these companies are capable of producing scene-stealers. What they seem to not get is the need for good marketing, however, and that may keep them from stepping up to their potential. Wrapping Up This CES is shaping up to be quite the fracas, not just in terms of infighting between vendors, but also between general mindshare when compared with Macworld, and Apple once again seems overmatched. But, given how Apple managed to wipe the floor with CES last year while in a similar position, it is too early to call the company out. I will say that it’s doing some questionable things though – including, towards the end of 2007, forcing Think Secret to close. Frankly, I’m not sure how many folks are going to feel comfortable buying from a company that does things like that and it may be that companies at CES will win because Apple throws the fight. Nevertheless, it continues to be a fascinating battle to watch and we’ll end up with great new products regardless. Here’s hoping the New Year proves a wonderful one for you – and not just in terms of technological innovation either! *Edit 1/1/08 - Removed reference to Dan Lyons as it turned out to be a hoax.
Post Your Comment...Comments
Anthony on Dec 31st, 2007 at 5:49 PM:
Umm, the Dan Lyons thing is satire.
It's satire, a joke. People can be so gullible.
z on Dec 31st, 2007 at 7:24 PM:
How is it that this shill can post more or less the same article this morning over at technewsworld admitting that the fake steve job thing was a joke but then not mention it was a joke in this article.
Probably because he is a "Pay to Say" microsoft astroturf "analyst" and making apple look like the evil empire is how he puts food on the table.
Dont listen to this clown. Apple came to what thinksecret's owner considered a good deal and he closed the site down. Fake steve jobs played out a parody of it happening to him. Rob here was duped probably because he's clueless and looking for anything he can find to smear the apple brand.
Here is this guys morning version of this article
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/commentary/6098...
Ari on Jan 1st, 2008 at 11:29 AM:
To DaveD:
You are a moron, his name is Rob not Ron. You looks like more of an idiot. Don't come back here, you are too stupid. K, thnx.
Ari on Jan 1st, 2008 at 11:31 AM:
Apple suing ThinkSecret and eventually shutting them down is an incredibly scary thing to watch. Apple should not have that much power over the press. Most of you guys think it's not a big deal because maybe you don't visit ThinkSecret. But how would you feel if Apple DID shut down your favorite Mac site?
iPodLounge had to change their name to iLounge because of Apple too.
Are you so blindly loyal to Apple that you will be defending them while you hang in a noose? Morons.
JeffZ on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 11:24 AM:
Why does everyonr rip Rob (or Ron) for an article that isn't pulling bias on either side. Did you not read any of the article? I know your feelings are strong, but who are you to cast stones without reading the entire article? That's why you read the articles and comment like a gladiator fights, instead of writing the articles yourself.
luis dias on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 12:13 PM:
"isn't pulling bias on either side"?
Gimme a break. This guy is a paid shill for years now. This should be obvious in the woes over the iphone, like "which has often been criticized for poor battery life, being relatively fragile, its high price tag, the device's use of the wrong carrier and having poor network speed."
Wich, by the way, are all blatant lies. I couldn't care less about the product, it has flaws, but ahem!, those just aren't it, so he's either ignorant or FUDDIng, as usual. It's battery life is the longest on smartphones, it's hard as hell to break it, it is much much cheaper than almost any other RIMM or windows mobile phones, if you consider all the contract's lifespan (which neither of these idiotic shills do), the device use of the RIGHT carrier, not because it is the coolest, but simply because it is GSM, which is what the first world countries use, and an incredible speed of networking with WIFI, and even incredible speeds with EDGE itself, I expected very worse indeed.
So is this "unbiased"?
Come on!
Scott Beckstead on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 5:56 PM:
Shills do as shills does. Rob You got so much stuff wrong in so many ways that even when you praise Apple you are wrong. Your credibility is shot I'm not bothering to read anything you write and I'm probably going to dump the RSS feed that this article came through. Not that you care I understand, but perhaps some other poor saps can be spared your meandering around the truth.
Frank J. on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 6:08 PM:
Wow, you Apple zealots are amazingly stupid. You bash him just to bash him, and yet you do not provide anything useful.
You are why I will never buy an Apple product. Their PC's are useless, just like their followers.
Simon on Jan 2nd, 2008 at 6:11 PM:
I took my iPhone back. The battery life is terrible, the internet speed is painfully slow and its way overpriced. I totally agree with Rob on that.
Apple created a trend with it's design, but I think the other manufacturers will adopt it and blow Apple away.
Neil on Jan 10th, 2008 at 8:03 PM:
The biggest advantage Apple has is OS X, something that will never appear on an HP or Dell machine. Apple's products are about more than looks. Also, the HP Blackbird is ugly, and I doubt this company will ever produce something "beautiful."
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.
RSS Feed
DaveD on Dec 31st, 2007 at 5:46 PM:
Ron... Ron... Ron....
"...and threatening Dan Lyons (the guy who pens Fake Steve Jobs) personally , going so far as to list his personal assets and seemingly threaten his family."
I thought you already corrected/retracted your misguidedness of this sort last week:
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/rob/?p=178
That was where YOU fell for a satire piece. But here:
http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/rob/?p=179
YOU seem to say that, well, the satirical nature of what Dan Lyons was doing went over your head!
And now here we are barely 3 days later and you felt you could get away with saying this same fallacy again?
Forget about learning the definition of satire Ron. Here's a better one you need to come to grips with - credibility.