Analyzing the NPD Game System Numbers: Why Nintendo Won 2007 and Sony Lost Big
January 23rd, 2008 | by Rob Enderle
Last week NPD released their market share numbers and the nice thing about NPD’s numbers are that they report what is actually sold (granted they use a sampling method which means there are inherent inaccuracies). But most of the other numbers you see reported don’t take into account inventory and thus they inflate the positions of those that had manufacturing advantages; in other words, they do not report how many consumer purchased them, just how many were sold to stores. Another problem is these numbers only represent the lucrative US market and they, and this piece, don’t represent the rest of the world ( Japan is a major battleground). Last year Nintendo remained manufacturing constrained which means they couldn’t fulfill demand and some of that demand likely bled over into the Microsoft and Sony camps. If you remember your economics, this showcases that demand for this segment is highly elastic in that it seems to swing dramatically based on the price of the device. However there are some clear indicators that I think should be pointed out, let’s cover those. That base is a huge magnet for game developers , who when faced with the choice of building a PS2 game which is both less expensive to create and has over 10x the installed base of the PS3 (3,250,000) that they will almost always choose the older platform. Sony actually made cost reducing moves which made the PS3 less compatible with PS2 content and probably partially to force game developers to reconsider, but the difference is just too great and they likely will regret this move when this is all over. Ironically, with Blu-Ray now in an almost insurmountable lead for the next generation high definition optical market, the only high volume connected player which won’t be obsolete when Blu-Ray 2.0 comes out is the PS3. But it is doubtful Sony will make enough from Blu-Ray royalties to offset the massive subsidy the PS3 carries. They need it to be a game console because games carry stronger royalties. In the end, based on these numbers, the PS3 was largely a mistake and they can spin it how they want, but the numbers say that if they hadn’t created it, the far more profitable PS2 would have likely sold significantly more than either the Xbox 360 or the Wii. Wii = Hurt by Manufacturing That health side is something no one else has figured out yet and while there was at least one controller that could be purchased to work with the Xbox or PlayStation it was expensive and largely unknown so didn’t do particularly well. However, I really doubt if either Sony or Microsoft is going to let Nintendo have this space unchallenged and Microsoft has already come out with the Arcade version of the Xbox 360 to partially address Nintendo’s competitive edge. Had Nintendo manufactured more consoles, they likely would have had a solid installed base lead at year-end but, because they didn’t, they now trail the Xbox 360 and I expect that will come back to haunt them this year. (Xbox installed base = 9.15 Million, Wii installed base 7.3 Million.) Xbox 360 = Hurt by Cost, Helped by Games However, Xbox console sales with plenty of inventory, lagged the Wii suggesting this platform is losing momentum and there is no indication that the secondary movie and music features are doing much to sell this product. People still seem to buy game consoles for games and neither the Sony Blu-Ray capability nor the Xbox 360 download or HD-DVD capability seems to have mattered much to the buyer as much as the cost of the device did. And I think the products, given it has been in the market much longer than the other two, is now feeling to many like it is out of date and it desperately needs more than a cosmetic refresh (and probably could use some cost reduction much like the PS2 enjoyed some time ago).
PS3= Boat Anchor
One thing was blindingly clear and that was that if Sony had skipped the PS3 they would have been in vastly better shape. It came in dead last with a little over half the sales (797,000) of either the Xbox 360 (1,260,000) or the Wii (1,350,000). But what was really amazing is that it undersold the PS2 (1,100,000) significantly, indicating that that this market voted with its pocketbook and the PS2 was favored over the PS3. The PS2 ended with an installed base estimated at a whopping 41 million consoles or over 4x the Xbox 360 (9,150,000) the nearest console competitor.
Given the Wii is showing the highest demand and actually sold the most units, it is likely at least some of the PS2, PS3, and Xbox sales were due to folks being unable to get the Wii. Products like the Wii (which are break out products) often have short life cycles because the broad market often decides to move on to other things in the following years. Given this thing has been hot two years running it looks like that may not be the case this time and the idea of a game console being a family device with health benefits may actually have legs.
The Wii is drifting away from conventional games as is core and that could mean that folks will buy it in addition to one of the three still active products (PS3/PS2/Xbox 360) which, if this is true, could give Nintendo an extended run unchallenged by competition.
With Halo 3 (4.82 million) and Call of Duty Xbox (3.04 million) the Xbox 360 had the most lucrative game titles on the market. The game console market is largely a razorblade model (yes I know that Nintendo argues they are different, but not enough to change the dynamics of the rest of the market dominated by Sony and Microsoft). This means it isn’t the number of consoles you sell that makes you profitable, it is the number of games and here the Xbox clearly stood out. Halo 3 alone sold nearly 5M copies while Call of duty 4 sold 3M to get to 8M generating pure profit for Microsoft. In perspective this is more than the PS3 sold consoles during the year and given it is estimated Sony takes a $400 hit on each console you can probably expect Microsoft’s CEO is a lot happier with these numbers than Sony’s CEO is.
In fact, it appears that overall, the Xbox 360 was a better magnet for the lucrative secondary revenue market than either the Wii or the PS3 likely because there were just more good games and accessories available for it.
The Big Winner: Nintendo DS
One thing that really jumps out though is the Nintendo DS selling nearly 2.5 Million units, more than the Wii and Xbox 360 (the two top selling consoles) combined. If you look at the installed base of the PSP and the DS, a whopping 27 Million units, you see numbers that are in the iPod range suggesting that the real action may no longer be with the consoles as much as it is with the handheld gaming systems and it makes you wonder when Microsoft will get its mobile act together and go after this seemingly more popular market.
Nintendo hit well with the DS and Sony is trying to take pricing actions to adjust the PSP to make it competitive (and the PSP remains the better value in terms of pure technology) but the market voted and it voted the DS over everything else; consoles and mobile systems alike. Kind of makes me wonder if Sony was late to a meeting that Microsoft missed altogether.
Wrapping Up: Keep it simple, inexpensive, and make it mobile
You look at the DS and it is less expensive and much simpler than the PSP and outsells it. The reason the Wii is in such heavy demand is because it’s less expensive and simpler than either the Xbox or the Playstation. The lesson for the market (and this is why the Palm in its day was so popular) why the iPod remains popular, and why the iPhone has done so well is: keep it simple. The other lesson is that $200 remains the magic price break point. Under $200 things sell really well, over $200 demand drops sharply and the farther you are above $200 the worse this is.
Atari owned this market first, Nintendo second, and Sony third. It looks like Nintendo took the market back last year and they did so by remembering these two things: Keep it simple and keep it inexpensive. They also tossed one more in the mix, and that is to make it mobile because folks often aren’t at home when they want to be, or want their kids to be entertained.
Post Your Comment...Comments
Graham on Jan 24th, 2008 at 8:14 PM:
Hey Rob,
This is meant with the best of intentions, so don't shoot the messenger: you might want to let the younger crew review the performance of systems out there; you might also want to research your stories more vigorously.
Sony does indeed report units sold through to the end user - the reason for the disparity is due to their inclusion of Black Friday numbers in their holiday period reporting - not, as you've said, because they report units sold to retailers.
It's clear Nintendo did very well this holiday season; the question is whether or not these users purchased a Wii Sports Machine or whether they'll continue to consume more software. Considering that the Wii has the largest installed base but it still only puts up average numbers for software it's clear that Nintendo's Blue Ocean strategy is missing the part where people "buy more stuff". Perhaps Wii Sports was a little too good - wait for Wii Fit to see the true software moving ability (or lack thereof) of this machine.
You've underestimated the PS3 here; the unit saved Blu-ray - now it's time for Blu-ray to save the PS3. Being the least expensive and most capable player out there, it will continue to find a home with HT enthusiasts... who will begin to explore the gaming aspect. These money-laden geeks, nerds and folks from all walks of life are far more likely to purchase more whiz-bang software than the retirement communities who are currently playing Wii bowling.
Sony's in this for the long haul, Rob. If you can't see past the current quarter I'd refrain from making dire predictions about a console's future.
Ian Bell on Jan 24th, 2008 at 8:41 PM:
Graham,
How about a simple "I disagree, and here is why"? No need for personal attacks, and least Rob has the guts to post his opinion on a site that gets millions of visitors - you have to respect that, even if you think he is wrong.
I am personally on the side of Graham when it comes to the PS3. I think Sony probably had two goals with the unit, use it to push Blu-ray forward (mission accomplished), and secondly to be the top gaming system (still working on that). I don't care how technologically advanced the PS3 is, until there are more games available for it, Xbox will be the king.
The Wii on the other hand, is nothing more than a "fad craze" ala Apple and with a low price-point of course people will eat it up. But like you said, software sales for the Wii are not as good as Nintendo would like you to believe (Microsoft publishes their software sales numbers, Nintendo has been less willing on the other hand). But I do think the Wii has the greatest potential. With a huge user base, developers WILL start creating more games for the system, it's just a matter of time when the Wii might overtake Microsoft here.
Sony has to be in the game for the long run, they have no choice. However with new game consoles coming out every 5-8 years or so, I am not sure the PS3 has the staying power for a phenominal finish.
I love my PS3 personally, I think it's an amazing system and the first party games are the best I have seen graphic-wise. But the Xbox 360 just has way more games to choose from and an online (Xbox Live) marketplace that blows the PS3 away.
Kerbe on Jan 24th, 2008 at 9:14 PM:
I agree with Graham... a little harsh on Rob but I agree. I commend not condemn Sony for pushing the envelope when it comes to new technology. I dont think bluray will save PS3... only killer titles... correction... killer EXCLUSIVE titles can save the PS3. Bluray playback is like icing on the cake, but I bought the PS3 for the games... the same reason I bought the 360. The Wii also has Metroid and Mario Galaxy which are good games. Smash Bros is on its way so Nintendo has some heat for Wii faithful. I think we need to also consider how Sony veiws their systems. Even though the new guy is out doesnt mean its time to forget about the past success... PS2 is proving that. We are not talking about Microsoft and their quick dismissal of the orginal Xbox. They had their reasons business wise but Sony doesnt have that same situation. Also, since when was the Xbox360 dated? So what if it was the first out the gate, the graphics are still second only to PCs and developers are still pushing the system. There really isnt a need for Microsoft to push the pricing lower right now, though it would be nice for new 360ist, because its competition, PS3, isnt pushing its price any lower, right now. At the end of the day, the 360 gives the best online gaming experience, PS3 gives the most bang for the buck dispite its price tag, and the Wii can compliment any of the two systems with its one of a kind gameplay and family/party friendly gaming lineup. Wii would like to play, so play beyond.... let's play together.
Rob Enderle on Jan 28th, 2008 at 5:42 PM:
I didn't mean to imply that Sony should kill the PS3, and agree that right now it is the best Blu-Ray deal going (just watched two movies myself on mine over the weekend).
Agree the secondary Wii numbers are weak, but then the Wii system itself (according to Nintendo) is actually in the black so doesn't have the cost recovery problem the PS3 enjoys. Still think the big thing was the handheld numbers and just how lucrative DS in particular appears to be.
The problem with Blu-Ray saving the PS3 is it adds too much cost to the system and if the price goal is $200 it will keep Sony from that goal for some time. The PS2 numbers are telling here and somehow they have to get this cost down. Right now the estimate of the subsidy attached to the PS3 is staggering.
I have a hard time thinking that movies on the PS3 will make a sustaining difference, whether it is the Xbox or the PS3 folks just didn't seem to go in that direction when given a choice and the Blu-Ray decks should drop below the PS3 price shortly.
As far as how Sony reports numbers, I never said I took numbers from the vendors. Nor did I say "all other numbers were different". What I said was "most" of the numbers that are reported are what the vendors sell to channel. This is accurate and true whether we are talking cell phones, PCs, or game systems and that is why I personally prefer NPD numbers. They aren't the vendor (and so are unlikely to be creative) and they report what folks actually buy.
Guillaume Gad on Jan 31st, 2008 at 7:10 AM:
"With a huge user base, developers WILL start creating more games for the system, it's just a matter of time when the Wii might overtake Microsoft here."
A huge user base is not the only matter for game dev.
Remember that programming anything on a Box360 means you'll reach the (also huge) 360 user base, plus the PC user base (around 15% of the overall market).
If you create a game for the Wii and want it to be ported to X360 or PS3 you have to do more than a "simple" code translation due to massive technical diff between theses consoles, most of the "Wii game", first designed for wii, are not ported on anything else (except NDS).
Lastly you need to remember the production costs for each console, Sony is by far the most expansive, than you have the Xbox, the Wii, the PSP and lastly the DS.
For all these reasons, user base is not the only matters when it comes to decide on what to develope a game.
If i had to choose, today, i'll choose DS or X360. You have to create AAA games to earn money on Wii or PS3, it's less true for the first two consoles mentionned.
(I do apologize for my mistakes; my English is far enough from being perfect.)
Randy Phillips on Feb 8th, 2008 at 5:28 PM:
Rob, the sales figures are very interesting, the PS3 is already at near 800,000 and the xbox at 1,270.000 The Xbox had a year head start? I think this year that gap will close and PS3 sales may even pass the Xbox. I own both systems and I wouldnt say the sony is a boat anchor, you may be eating ur statistics. Do yo own any game console? I think your statements are similar to saying that Lexus is a boat anchor cause it sold less than Chevy. The Wii and DS and PS2 are great for Kids and low tech budget watching consumers. The sales of all units may slow because of this worsening economy. But in a few years I believe the PS3 will come out on top, it's a gorgeous unit with too many things going for it. What do you drive?
Brent Green on Feb 11th, 2008 at 11:33 AM:
I only own the XBox 360 console (I am currently on my fourth box). I am not interested in Blu-Ray and have been burned so many times by Sony that I will probably never own another Sony product again. I am very interested in the physical benefits of the Wii, but I am holding out for Microsoft to come out with a similar system for the 360 as I do not like the cheesy games that are made for the Wii.
I love Mass Effect (exclusive to XBox 360), but I do not enjoy playing online. I have Halo 3, but I have only played it for less than an hour.
I am also hoping that Microsoft comes out with a portable game system. The PSP suffers from a lack of dual analog controllers and the single analog stick is located far too low for my hand. The DS again suffers from a lack of good solid games for my taste. In fact, I bought all of my kids leapsters so that they could actually learn something instead of just wasting time.
Long and short, my dollars are going to continue going exclusively for the Microsoft camp.
EdgeOne on Feb 13th, 2008 at 4:31 AM:
First, I am 35, grew up with games, and have an Xbox 360, Nintendo Wii, a DS and a PSP (and yes, I've kissed a girl).
Wii is amazing in that friends of mine that haven't owned a gaming console since the Atari 2600 or NES are now buying a Wii! Actually, people are buying Wii Sports (and the hardware just happens to be necessary to play it) This is a HUGE point that will play itself out in the future. I've been able to find a few additional titles worth some Wii playtime, but most my friends who bought a Wii are asking me what else they can play that's as fun as Wii sports. A few bought games and were disappointed and others rented with no success. The people that bought the Wii for Tennis, Bowling, etc. are not getting on the Mario bandwagon (even though Mario Galaxy is one of the best polished/looking games for the Wii). Nintendo, if you're listening, better come out with Wii Sports 2 and it better have online play.
While I agree Wii is in a league of its own, it did lose market share to other consoles simply because it wasn't on the shelves at Christmas (or any other time for that matter, unless you're fond of getting in line to get a ticket to get in a line...). Again, I have personal experience of friends picking up a gaming console for the kids for Christmas and while Wii was the first choice, they weren't going home empty handed. The idea of having TWO gaming consoles in the home to them is about as likely as Marty McFly finding two TV sets in his Mom's 1955 home in Back to the Future.
However, the Wii is priced right and once people don't have to wait in line to get one, I think they're warm up to idea of picking one up, even if they did buy a PS2 or 360 (no one I know walked in to buy a Wii and walked out with a PS3)
Some other points:
-Xbox Live is just awesome. Hearing little kids cuss over the headsets is not, leave the headset off or set it to only hear friends. MS should have included a Hard Drive (HD) in every console though. Between using Xbox Live and have any type of backward compatibility, it's a must own. Downloadable Movies and shows has some real merit IF they start to price content a little lower and MS stops charging ridiculous amounts of money for their HDs.
-"Home theater enthusiasts" were buying PS3s for Blu Ray when the next cheapest player was $999. PS3 is a loud, noisy, annoying Blu Ray player. Still, it is a good deal for someone who bought their first LCD and wants HD movies and games, but must have PS3 games are still lacking and 360 has been able to share in once Sony-exclusive titles.
-PS3 will come into its own eventually and I will buy one... eventually. I used to love Sony as a kid, and to think I now prefer a Microsoft product over Sony... what kind of world are living in? It's like the 360 is making for up for having to deal with MS OS, Outlook, Office. Whereas the once-loved Sony has made me suffer through MiniDisc, Memory Stick, Root kit, UMD on my PSP, and their lust for DRM. Don't even get me started on Blu Ray 1.0-2.0-? vs HD DVD or Sony dropping PS2 backward compatibility on low end PS3s (that's not going to make any parents angry).
But I digress... and have written almost as much as Rob originally did in his great article. It's a wonderful time to be a gamer or to get into it! Just have fun with it and remember the consumer wins when fair competition is in play.
Michael on Feb 27th, 2008 at 7:03 AM:
Good article. I have to disagree with one of your points though. I think the PS3 will pull through to be the most popular system out of the three. Now that Blu-ray has officially won the format war, I see more people buying it to have a combination high-def dvd player and a good game system. This will attract to the widest audience as opposed to the Xbox that is more for gamers. I think the biggest thing holding the PS3 back right now is the cost for the games. If they were to lower them slightly, they would surely take a larger chunk of the market.
John on Mar 7th, 2008 at 4:54 PM:
Well I agree that the 360 has more games but also its been out since fall 2005 if they weren't alot of games i would be dissapointed. The 360 if i remember correctly only had 8 games in launch date. I have a wii and its a cool system but the game selection is limited and childish for the most part. The PS3 i also own and its the system that has given me no problems amazing graphics and the blu-ray its awesome.
The wii is $250 in retail stores but its not next generation
The 360 is $350 with a 20 gig hardrive. And if you want to play online u have to pay $50 for the year. if you want to go wifi the router is 100 and the HD Drive is about 180. so lets see
thats $680 all together
The PS3 $399 for the 40 gig hardrive. Has wifi, free online, comes blu-ray its all in one package.
I own all the systems and my 360 broke twice cause of the death ring.
I feel that the playstation 3 is the most reliable system
To be honest the awesome drive of the wii are the mario games. but after super smash bros. on march and mario kart on april i say that PS3 will run the show until E3 comes again and people see whats coming out later that year
I sound like a PS3 fan but how can I not be when the only bad thing about it its just the price...
John Doria on Mar 7th, 2008 at 4:54 PM:
Well I agree that the 360 has more games but also its been out since fall 2005 if they weren't alot of games i would be dissapointed. The 360 if i remember correctly only had 8 games in launch date. I have a wii and its a cool system but the game selection is limited and childish for the most part. The PS3 i also own and its the system that has given me no problems amazing graphics and the blu-ray its awesome.
The wii is $250 in retail stores but its not next generation
The 360 is $350 with a 20 gig hardrive. And if you want to play online u have to pay $50 for the year. if you want to go wifi the router is 100 and the HD Drive is about 180. so lets see
thats $680 all together
The PS3 $399 for the 40 gig hardrive. Has wifi, free online, comes blu-ray its all in one package.
I own all the systems and my 360 broke twice cause of the death ring.
I feel that the playstation 3 is the most reliable system
To be honest the awesome drive of the wii are the mario games. but after super smash bros. on march and mario kart on april i say that PS3 will run the show until E3 comes again and people see whats coming out later that year
I sound like a PS3 fan but how can I not be when the only bad thing about it its just the price...
John Doria on Mar 7th, 2008 at 4:54 PM:
Well I agree that the 360 has more games but also its been out since fall 2005 if they weren't alot of games i would be dissapointed. The 360 if i remember correctly only had 8 games in launch date. I have a wii and its a cool system but the game selection is limited and childish for the most part. The PS3 i also own and its the system that has given me no problems amazing graphics and the blu-ray its awesome.
The wii is $250 in retail stores but its not next generation
The 360 is $350 with a 20 gig hardrive. And if you want to play online u have to pay $50 for the year. if you want to go wifi the router is 100 and the HD Drive is about 180. so lets see
thats $680 all together
The PS3 $399 for the 40 gig hardrive. Has wifi, free online, comes blu-ray its all in one package.
I own all the systems and my 360 broke twice cause of the death ring.
I feel that the playstation 3 is the most reliable system
To be honest the awesome drive of the wii are the mario games. but after super smash bros. on march and mario kart on april i say that PS3 will run the show until E3 comes again and people see whats coming out later that year
I sound like a PS3 fan but how can I not be when the only bad thing about it its just the price...
John Vega on Mar 7th, 2008 at 4:54 PM:
Well I agree that the 360 has more games but also its been out since fall 2005 if they weren't alot of games i would be dissapointed. The 360 if i remember correctly only had 8 games in launch date. I have a wii and its a cool system but the game selection is limited and childish for the most part. The PS3 i also own and its the system that has given me no problems amazing graphics and the blu-ray its awesome.
The wii is $250 in retail stores but its not next generation
The 360 is $350 with a 20 gig hardrive. And if you want to play online u have to pay $50 for the year. if you want to go wifi the router is 100 and the HD Drive is about 180. so lets see
thats $680 all together
The PS3 $399 for the 40 gig hardrive. Has wifi, free online, comes blu-ray its all in one package.
I own all the systems and my 360 broke twice cause of the death ring.
I feel that the playstation 3 is the most reliable system
To be honest the awesome drive of the wii are the mario games. but after super smash bros. on march and mario kart on april i say that PS3 will run the show until E3 comes again and people see whats coming out later that year
I sound like a PS3 fan but how can I not be when the only bad thing about it its just the price...
Comment on this article
Please keep your comments relevant to this article. Email addresses are not displayed, they are only required to verify you are human.
When you submit your comment, an email will be sent to your email address with a confirmation link. Once you have clicked on that confirmation link your comment will be posted.
HTML is not allowed.

Kerbe on Jan 24th, 2008 at 12:23 PM:
I wonder why the Nintendo Wii is still being compared or put into competition with the Xbox 360 and the PS3. The Wii is in a class by itself. The reason why Nintendo can relax a bit with its inability to manufacture consoles per customer demand is that it offers game play that no other system can offer. Anyone that wants a Wii will not buy a PS3 or a Xbox 360 instead for that very fact unless they wanted one in the first place. I can see that statement being true if someone bought a PS3 instead of a 360 because they are comparable products. Hats off to Microsoft for Xbox Live and exclusive killer games. I can only hope that Sony can correct the wrongs on the PS3 with their own exclusive killer games. I have all three systems and love them each for different reasons. Honestly I spend more time on the Xbox 360 because of the game line up and Xbox Live. The Wii is fun but it gets old kinda fast... still love it though. I think of the Wii as an "add-on" system... not good enough to be by itself but too good not to have. Hats off to Nintendo for figuring that out.